Review of Gloss by Ida Stewart

In her debut collection, Ida Stewart offers readers a soundscape that is both playful and deadly serious in its love of our language and its concern for the poet’s place of origin—the West Virginia mountains. Gloss weaves these thematic strands into poems of praise and elegy that interrogate—sometimes directly, sometimes by suggestion—the changing Appalachian landscape and the multivalence of English speech. One of Stewart’s many gifts is the ability to push plain Appalachian diction to the level of high lyricism. “I’m floodplain folk—,” she says (in “The Bottoms”), “open arms and gasping / pores—drunk and fixing to drink / some more.” Her speakers are reverent and enraptured but never hollowly Romantic, a people “always in a fix / here, fixed, fixing, asphyxiating / on the basics” with “the mountain breathing down [their] necks.” The exhilarating sense of dread in these lines lingers on every page, tempered always by the physical delight Stewart’s sounds and rhythms can’t help but trigger.

Many poems in Gloss deal with the destructive mining practice of mountaintop removal. The result is a collection that is necessarily political but, thanks to Stewart’s deftness, never preachy, never self-righteous, and anything but self-pitying. Even at its most direct, Gloss chooses matter-of-factness over vitriol. Take, for example, the end of “Glossary: Tainted Words” (one of several “Glossary” poems in the collection):

  moun-tain
   See maintain.

  main-tain
  To keep in an existing state;
  to persevere;
  to preserve from decline;
  to uphold and defend;
  to affirm in or as if in argument;

  from the French
  hand & to hold.

Even in this moment of dictionary-like seriousness, it is the soundplay of “mountain” and “maintain” that allows this poem its moving, associative resonance and pushes the tone from the impersonality of a glossary entry to the quiet intimacy of “hand & to hold.” While Stewart’s defense of her mountains can be, as here, calm and powerfully quiet, that is not always the case. She is not afraid to throw her voice into speakers whose words tumble out as urgently and frenetically as their thoughts, as we see in “The mountaintop refuses his advances,” one poem (reprinted below in its entirety) from a series of eleven portraits and monologues:

  I need you like I need a hole in my heart
 a soul in my head a hold in my hand and
  sand in my bed a foal in my whale a flood
  in my horse a toad in my ode a skoal in
  my toast a hot coal in my throat a listen,
  drop dead, you toll in my house for you for
  whom I’ve bled infrared black and blue you
  pistol-spit you stone-face you price on my
  hide you violence purebred: I need you like
  I need another vowel in my head another
  hope in this hope-heap of hope upon hope
  that becomes me my knoll my knoll-edge
  my backbone my hymn-knell to this earth.

Even at her most playful, Ida Stewart brings deep feeling and serious insight to the page as she propels her readers from poem to poem. Gloss is a fast-moving book, but not for lack of substance, and Stewart’s variations in form and pacing ensure that the poems never run monotonously into one another. Alongside the glossary and text-block shapes seen above are poems such as “The mountaintop unmoored” and “The Family,” which make powerful use of short free-verse lines, short stanzas, and sound-mirroring in constructing the body of Gloss, as well as blank verse poems like “Subsidence” and “Salamander” and sonnets like “What Gives” and “Sum,” which are as strong and vital as bone.
Ida Stewart is a serious poet, and if she is playful it is a serious play, like Vygotsky’s, in which she engages—a play that blurs the real with the imagined until her imagination becomes our reality. That is exactly what Gloss does for us. For those who want to see how far the imagination can stretch words without sacrificing meaning, this is a necessary collection.

Ida Stewart. Gloss. Florence, MA: Perugia Press, 2011. Paper, 92 pp., $16.00.

Review of The Long Drive Home by Will Allison

Telling lies should be easy. We’ve all made off with or fib or two to avoid punishment or to get what we want. Fiction writers and actors take commerce in elaborate conceits designed to suspend disbelief for an hour, for the length of a book. Consider then the prospects of a lie when both our personal preservation and our children’s futures are at stake. Biology tells us the survival of our genes eclipses every other concern, and everyone knows that the guilty may avoid just sentencing if they can afford a decent defense team. So what makes us confess? What compels us to tell the truth? Even if we know our friends and family—if attuned to our betrayals—would sever ties and never speak to us again? And what if the culprit can’t imagine an eye in the sky to tally his or her murders or misdemeanors? Would we still seek to purge our misdeeds to those who look up to us most? Or would we rather continue to conceal our blighted consciences and take our chances on a day of reckoning that seems unlikely to come?

Will Allison’s second novel, Long Drive Home (Free Press), hurls its protagonist Glen Bauer headlong into this murky ethical terrain after a moment of road rage ends with the “accidental” death of teenager Juwan Richards and marks the beginning of the end of Glen’s once happy household.

“I very much wanted to give him [Glen] as many chances to be less guilty in his own mind. I wanted to let him off the hook,” Allison says. Certainly, the text abounds with a haven of evasions for Glen: his six-year-old daughter, Sara (and only other witness to the wreck), seems to remember very little of the actual accident; the mother of the deceased Tawana is married to a radiologist and wants to move own without civil trail; the teen driver was found to be not only speeding, but drunk and talking on his cell phone at the moment his Jaguar collided with a tree; and then there’s even Glen’s wife Liz who—keen to the designations of guilt in both civil and criminal courts—reminds him that he wasn’t totally at fault and that “Having a guilty conscience isn’t the same as being guilty” (72). Still, Glen, hounded by a relentless detective named Rizzo, secretly and subconsciously senses his complicity in Juwan’s death and later seeks both punishment and redemption to his personal peril, even when it becomes evident that he will be let off the hook for vehicular manslaughter.

Beyond road rage, the impetus for this novel—as much of the setting—sprouted from the author’s personal life as a stay-at-home dad in New Jersey: “We moved here from Indianapolis, and then before that from we lived in Cincinnati and Columbus. I really didn’t think it would be that different driving here than anywhere else, but it really was different…I spend a lot more time in the car than I’d like to, and a lot more time exposed to the local traffic.”

When asked about why people seem more apt to become hostile on the road than in line a crowded grocery store or at a ballpark, Allison offers this insight: “You’re enclosed in a car, so you have a since of anonymity in dealing with other drivers, and unless you’re driving in your own neighborhood—a few blocks from your house—you have no expectation that you’re ever going to have to deal with this person again. There’s just a lot less reason to hold your anger in. And also the stakes are so much higher when you’re in this giant machine and you can get killed and kill someone pretty easily.”

Like Glen, Will—as any parent—only wants to ferry his daughter to school safely and to expect that she can pedal her bike down the street without some maniac running her off the road. When confronted with other drivers’ recklessness, Will Allison also confesses—that like Glen—he finds it difficult to suppress his paternal indignation in this anecdote about the moment the ideas behind Long Drive Home originally took root:

“I had come out to get the newspaper one morning and a car was just flying down the street, and even though at that early there’re weren’t any kids out, no joggers and nobody walking their dogs, I still had this momentary impulse where I just wanted to pick up the paper and throw it at the car…Of course I then immediately realized what a stupid idea that was and how I could’ve caused an accident. But then the writer part of me started thinking so what if no one saw it? What would happen then?”

Of course, the circumstances in the novel are different in that Glen served his car into the other lane to scare Juwan into slowing down, but the dark necessity that ensues hatches from a similar line of questioning.

Like the Chandleresque noir aura seeded in the title, Long Drive Home zeros in on the facts beyond hypothetical evasion. Glen is liable, he knows it. More than that, he knows his daughter knows it, and even schemes—to his eventual shame—to keep his daughter out of therapy fearing she might confide the events which led up to the crash. Page after page, Glen must squirm and twist the facts in his daughter’s mind and as the investigation unfolds he must convince her that she did not see what she saw. Only at the end does Glen finally confront the bleak results of his perpetual deceit when he asks his daughter:

“Do you think it was my fault?”

She drummed her feet against the back of the passenger seat. The light changed. We turned onto West Montrose, then Vose. “Not if you didn’t mean to,” she said, finally. “You didn’t mean to scare him.”

My knuckles went white on the steering wheel. So there it was. She’d known all along, or at least suspected. Of course I’d meant to scare him. If she hadn’t seen it in my eyes as I cut the wheel that day, watching me in the review mirror as she was watching me now, then it was only a matter of time before the full truth dawned on her.

“But you always said it was his fault,” I reminded her. “You never said anything about it to me.”

She resumed kicking the seat. “I know. I thought you’d be upset.” [178]

In this way, Allison cleverly demonstrates how crimes, when kept secret, implicate—and even traumatize—others in perpetuating a charade of fecklessness. This whirlpool of deception envelopes Glen and entices the reader, especially when Liz—Glen’s wife—comes up with the idea to divorce in order to indemnify her and their daughter in the advent of a lawsuit. Still, this faux separation doomed itself from the onset considering how the terms of this tacit pact, being unspoken, never had a chance to articulate themselves:

“…I wondered if Liz really believed what she’d said about the accident being Juwan’s fault, or if it was just her way of circling the wagons. For that matter, had she really believed me? Surely the thought that I might still be lying had crossed her mind. Maybe it was a case of not wanting to know more. Maybe we’d already entered into an unspoken agreement where she wouldn’t ask and I wouldn’t tell. Of course, the problem with an unspoken agreement is that you can never be sure it exists.” [55]

Gradually, Glen’s left to fend against his own conscience as he’s forced to move out and dissemble a divorce until the two year period for civil litigation passes. His isolation slowly sizzles into Dostoyevskian claustrophobia, particularly under the scrutiny of Rizzo, the seasoned detective:

“But why did you cut the wheel?” Rizzo asks Glen, later stating: “Your front tires—they’re turned toward the curb. Away from your driveway.”

“I don’t know. I guess I still had a hand on the wheel when I reached for her [Sara].” I mimed the action of holding the steering wheel with my left hand, turning it as I reached back with my right. “I must have turned it without meaning to.”

Instead of stony disbelief I was expecting, Rizzo said, “Makes sense.”

I’d managed to regain my composure, but the fact that he once again seemed so willing to take me at my word was starting to worry me. A guilty conscience can be tricky that way; knowing I was lying made it hard to believe anyone else could believe me. I couldn’t help thinking he was just biding his time, lulling me, waiting for me to drop my guard.” [76-77]

On perpetual high-alert, the simple presence of others crushes Glen as he jostles and deflects blame. Either they must be persuaded to his cause or repelled away. This defensiveness later develops into paranoia, twisting every encounter with even those closest to him into an accusation.

Though Long Drive Home differs drastically from Allison’s debut What You Have Left, which was selected for both Barnes & Nobel’s Discover Great New Writers as well as a notable book by the San Francisco Chronicle, the difference only demonstrates this author’s versatility in pumping out remarkably sharp prose.

As a narrative of events, nothing gets dumped onto the reader. Everything relevant to the scene comes out precisely when needed to expedite plot, and we never meander aimlessly through back story. We move scene by scene with vital and visceral accuracy. Given that this novel employs the unequivocally tricky double-I narrative technique (where the first person narrator speaks his or her gained wisdom in the narration of past events), this accomplishment—in terms of craft—certainly lives up to Allison’s standards of a good read:

“I don’t like reading a book where information is withheld from me when I think that it should be given as a function of the view points. And withholding information is infuriating just to keep me turning the page…I look for a story that gives me a good sense of what’s at stake early on and keeps me turning the pages. The entertainment value of reading is important to me…I just read an essay by Lev Grossman who talks about how modernists changed the novel in the early 20th century and how it went from being Charles Dickens—where you always know whose talking in the book and what’s happening—as compared to The Sound and the Fury and Ulysses, and how the novel became a difficult thing, and if the novel wasn’t difficult then it was probably low-brow. He makes the argument that contemporary novelists are starting to move away from that idea, and are writing books that…can still be high-brow while being a page turner.”

While writing, Allison likes to keep a couple books on the table in case he gets stuck. The titles he went back to the most while composing Long Drive Home, where Slaughter House Five (for structure) and—not surprisingly in terms of narrative—William Maxwell’s masterpiece So Long, See You Tomorrow. Again, the double-I presents many obstacles from the beginning, as with Allison’s comments about the generation of this novel:

“This book had initially started out as a completely epistolary novel. It was all a letter from Glen to his daughter Sara. But eventually I couldn’t make that work in that case because there was information I wanted to get to the reader that I couldn’t in a letter without it being a totally fake letter. It would require Glen to say things to Sara that he already knows that she knows. So the sections in the book that are still letters are remnants of this original structure. But then once I moved out of the letter I had to deal with the question as to whether to write it in present tense, without Glen having more knowledge of what’s coming, and I didn’t want to do that. [Still] Telling it from the end of the story…I was very conscious not making the reader feel that I was withholding information in an unfair way, point of view wise.”

Allison—who’s currently working on a sequel to Long Drive Home—says the leanness of this book comes from the fact that he was working under a deadline. He hopes to expand and develop the role of Liz—Glen’s Wife—who the author fears in this book comes off a bit harsh and hostile. Still, the Liz of Long Drive Home precisely represents the version of his wife that Glen would be ruminating upon at this time in his life. Glen—the narrator—feels irrevocably estranged from his ex-wife and daughter and is still trying to comprehend the events that derailed his family life. Ultimately, Glen is a man hoping to rebuild his image in the eyes of his daughter:

“I wanted to close with something useful. A lesson you could apply to your own life. The problem is, I’m not sure what that might be. That it’s a good idea to tell the truth? That it actually doesn’t matter if you do? That sometimes your mistakes catch up with you and sometimes they don’t? Or that they always do, though not necessarily in the ways you might expect.” [181]

Review of Miroslav Penkov’s East of the West: A Country in Stories

Miroslav Penkov. East of the West: A Country in Stories. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, Giroux. Hardcover, 240 pp., $24.00.

Miroslav Penkov’s literary debut, East of the West: A Country in Stories, is a beautifully written, at times sentimental, and almost-always tragicomic story collection that worries itself with much more than the author’s place of origin, Bulgaria. Much can be made of the suggestive subtitle, A Country in Stories, but Penkov’s narratives do more than simply explore his eastern European roots, their mythologies and personal histories. They also confront the American immigrant experience, address notions of transience, and illuminate the restlessness of a modern, global life.

However, the tales in this collection wish to specifically not be about one place or another, but instead delve into the gray area between locales. The story “Buying Lenin,” which appeared in The Best American Short Stories 2008 (originally published in The Southern Review), attempts just that as it charts the biting relationship between a grandfather and grandson, the former staunchly pro-communist, the latter happily headed for school in capitalist America. In this piece Penkov achieves a emotional tug-of-war between the past and present, between the old and the young, between here and there. The result is a transatlantic dialogue that highlights Sinko’s complex sense of guilt and freedom. He does not understand his grandfather’s adherence to outdated communist ideals, but even still, “blood,” the patriarch hopes, “is thicker than the ocean,” and so the young man, despite his international relocation, is pulled toward home and family. Hopelessly out of place in America, he wants more than anything for “the old man to promise he’d wait for [him] out in the yard, under the black grapes of the trellised vine.” Yet the story ends without Sinko heeding his grandfather’s call to come back to Bulgaria, which subtly asserts the notion that home is not a place that can be lost and found again. Rather, once abandoned, our homelands disappear forever, leaving the rest of the world dim and gray since no destination, no future country or land, can ever replace the draw of one’s first community, a force Penkov imagines as a “collective consciousness.” “Buying Lenin” ends with laughter, but a reader cannot forget that Sinko remains alone in United States still yearning to become “a part of [the collective consciousness],” still “want[ing] in,” and still wishing “to dream the dreams of other people.”

East of the West also proves to be a gorgeous primer on Bulgarian history, or at least Bulgarian folklore: “Makedonija” pairs military record with the plight of a seventy-one year-old husband struggling to care for a wife who’s barely survived two strokes; the title story, “East of the West,” draws a romantic note from the dangerous border between Serbia and Bulgaria in 1970; “Cross Thieves” pokes fun at the political instability of Penkov’s homeland in the late nineteen-nineties via the perspective of a wunderkind with photographic memory; and “Devshirmeh” demonstrates how people are both sustained and revealed through the stories they tell, this final piece in the collection employing an ancient tale that the narrator says, “begins with blood…And with blood it ends.”

In that sense A Country in Stories reads not so far from the truth, though in reality Penkov’s ability to balance private sentiment against political and cultural upheaval is what affords this collection its emotional as well as its geographic scope. As a storyteller Penkov concerns himself with the distance between people instead of the distance between nations, such that even tales like the title story “East of the West,” which rely heavily upon place-particular conflict, are memorable not just in their portrayal of provincial circumstance, but also in their depiction of personal longing. The aforementioned story concerns romantic love across a gun-guarded river boundary, and what’s gripping is not the threat of death, but the threat of love lost. In a very striking manner, these stories use people to illuminate place as much as they use place to explain people. The uncanny and reciprocal relationship Penkov constructs between his characters and the worlds they inhabit is, without a doubt, the real triumph of this debut.

To all that one must finally add Penkov’s writing, which is light and liquid; it spills across the page with ease. Some of this comes from the author’s dominant use of the first person perspective, which allows his narrators at-will opportunities for insight and close, emotional explication. Yet Penkov’s real talent lies in his ability to speak with equal authority about both history and character. Steady, striking voices tell these stories, and they relay with confidence and empathy not only the tumultuous Bulgarian past, but also the tumultuous decisions and events of each protagonist’s life. Penkov gives due weight to both the macro and the micro, the final product being a collection which illuminates the universal themes of war, exile and immigration while also paying deference to the nuances of each Bulgarian protagonist’s particular plight. East of the West proves a marvelous debut from a writer with talent and heart, and readers everywhere would do well to trek with Penkov across his beloved eastern European landscape and then follow him to wherever he goes next.

Review of Sarah Gorham’s Bad Daughter

Sarah Gorham. Bad Daughter. New York: Four Way Books, 2011. Paper, 80 pp., $15.95.

Reading Sarah Gorham’s poetry brings to mind perhaps the most memorable and oft-quoted lines from Philip Larkin: “They fuck you up, your mum and dad, / They may not mean to but they do.” That analogy, of course, is a humorous oversimplification. Gorham’s work deals with family dynamics and the fact of human imperfection without Larkin’s ironic snideness, but with the wisdom, mature playfulness, and genuine pathos of Larkin’s most compelling work. In her previous collection The Cure (Four Way Books, 2003), Sarah Gorham told us the story of a family bowing under the weight of the father’s alcoholism. Her new offering, Bad Daughter, explores the complex and often fraught relationship between mothers and daughters. In “Homesickness,” the speaker tells us, “Genes are a kind of blue letter from a mother / to her daughter: Good news, bad news.” These are indeed poems of “bad news” and “good news”—of pain and joy—and, as in the best work of many poets, the two work together to form the powerful emotional landscape of this collection.

In Bad Daughter, that landscape is never an easy one—never black and white. There is an exhilarating darkness in poems like “Immortality,” in which the speaker says of a baby, “Remember when the names for little things weren’t sickening? // Touch that fantastic little foot. The baby is an implant, a fresh cutting. / She will take. She will take you away.” The play of violence and wonder in these skillful lines makes plain the irony in them without veering into sarcasm. Even darker is the poem “Barbecue,” which employs a less subtle violence in one of the collection’s most evocative metaphors. Here, the speaker compares four sisters to the four tines of a fork:

    […] Sisters—they were that close,
  jockeying for love in a cage
  with silver bars. The origin of the fork

  was a spear in an animal’s heart.
  You’ve heard of knife scars
  on a plate? Blame it on the knife,

  though the fork held the weakling down.

The metaphor is complicated. The knife here is not the parents, as one might expect, for the speaker will “mind / her parents’ appeal for peace” and “place her knife back on the table.” There is no easy, moralistic reading for poems such as this, and that is the power of Gorham’s work; she investigates the difficult, often unsettling nature of family dynamics without self-pity and without pointing fingers. Bad Daughter reminds us that family is not static but, rather, an ever-evolving relationship: “To my child I become my mother,” Gorham says (in “Accommodation”), “and her mother, and hers.”

The joys of Bad Daughter are not to be found only in these questions of family. Gorham, with the skill and confidence of a master artisan, crafts poems in an array of styles and forms that never impose themselves on the work, but seem always necessary: from prose poems like “After Pindar” and “Bob White” to rhyming, shortened-lined sonnets like “Compost” and “Pond in Winter” to the free verse of “Our House” and “The Sacrifice,” whose lines move elegantly around the middle of the page. Each poem, whether directly addressing the complexities of daughterhood announced in the title or not, plays an integral part in constructing Bad Daughter, a collection that is gracefully made, challenging, moving, and unquestionably whole.

Review of David Rigsbee’s The Red Tower: New and Selected Poems

David Rigsbee. The Red Tower: New and Selected Poems. NewSouth Books, 2010. $24.95

David Rigsbee has the kind of enviable journal and magazine credits that might suggest a high national profile. The acknowledgments page of The Red Tower: New and Selected Poems lists such prestigious and widely distributed venues as The American Poetry Review, The New Yorker, and Poetry, as well as such highly respected university-sponsored publications as The Southern Review, The Georgia Review, and The Journal. However, his many books have generally been published by small presses, which, given their limited resources for advertising and distribution, tend to find readers fit but few. He may be more widely known for his co-editorship of Invited Guest, a valuable University of Virginia Press anthology of twentieth-century Southern poetry, than for his own poems.

The Red Tower is Rigsbee’s first publication with NewSouth Books, which, though another small press, seems more interested in publicizing its releases than do many others. The Red Tower thus seems likely to bring Rigsbee something more like the recognition he deserves. The book offers a substantial overview of his work: sixty-five previously collected poems and excerpts from two long sequences join sixteen new poems, providing a substantial overview of his forty-year career.

The new poems come first; taken together, the opening three make a good introduction to the whole collection. “Harp” cinematically invites us into “a room / not mine”—a room in which the poet is “sitting by a wooden harp”—and shares the room’s view of a woman across the street hanging wash on her balcony. As the poet watches, he is “thinking of hot, loser towns / where I am no longer, of years imagined / when I never was,” then fastens our attention on a particular item in that load of laundry:

One child’s dress, an ever-
serviceable blue cotton smock, says it all,
hanging four-square from the balcony rail,
as if in the absence of its little owner, billowing,
it took that absence on a journey.
Pointless speculation, says a contrapuntal voice,
and yet that is what I did with my life.

So the poem concludes. “Harp,” like much of The Red Tower, offers an attractive combination of precision and mystery: the language is deft, economical, and evocative, but the relationship between image and idea can be elusive. (The dress says what all, exactly?) But Rigsbee connects far more dots than he doesn’t. He’s no John Ashbery, relentlessly pulling the rug out from under our feet; he’s an occasionally elliptical artist whose ellipses seem designed to draw in rather than shut out his readers. In those final two lines, “Harp” also articulates a modesty that pervades this book. Though Rigsbee often inserts himself into his poems, he hardly writes in the self-aggrandizing vein of much recent American poetry. Indeed, the image of him sitting next to a harp (a laughable exaggeration of the traditional lyre), and moreover a harp that stands silent, suggests nothing so much as the poet’s sense of his own uselessness, a sense only reinforced by the poem’s ending. It’s a poignant but also appealingly self-critical sentiment with which to open a retrospective.

Next comes the shorter and more startling “After Reading.” Reading someone’s work (but whose, he doesn’t say), Rigsbee thinks “how purity is a curse, how it / puts us off the human,” distracting us from the real world we live in—or, as he puts it, from “the garbage and the grief.” This leads him to recall standing in St. Peter’s, gazing at the Pietà, and having a surprising thought about the 1972 attack on that masterpiece: he found himself “secretly admiring / the madman whose hammer / chipped the same marble that made / Michelangelo such a monster.” Several poems in The Red Tower demonstrate a value of “impurity” over “purity,” some by indulging in the grotesque (“Spaghetti,” “Hosanna,” “The Exploding Man”), some by engaging in the kind of ellipsis discussed above (“A Life Preserver,” “Autobiography,” “Almost You”), and some by partly adopting and partly resisting the strictures of traditional verse form (“Sonnet,” Cloud Journal, Sonnets to Hamlet).

The third new poem, “The Red Tower,” sounds a recurring theme: the poet’s anguish over his younger brother’s death, which we eventually learn was a suicide. Rigsbee writes, “Yeats was wrong when he wrote / that God talked to those long dead”; he offers “a blinking tower / on a mountain” as an image of such communication, noting that its pulsing red light “raised no one.” He closes with a rhetorical question, repeated as if in despair: “Because even if / God talked to the dead, what could / He possibly say to them? / What could He possibly say?” Several of the poems dealing with his brother’s life and death are very strong (“In Ohio,” “The Mermaid,” “Safe Box,” “Linking Light”), but one is particularly remarkable: “Four Last Songs,” a virtuosic four-part, eighteen-page poem based on Richard Strauss’s Vier Letzte Lieder. Strauss’s songs, settings of poems by Hermann Hesse and Joseph von Eichendorff, encourage an acceptance of death; Rigsbee integrates them, passage by passage, into this long meditation on his brother’s last act, setting off the borrowings by printing them in all caps. The result is a powerful counterpoint between turmoil and peace that Rigsbee finally resolves: “let us not lose our way / but move along the wall of silence // and cling, as he has done, to the wall of silence.”

The Red Tower is a very rich book, one difficult to do justice in a short review, but at least two more aspects need to be noted, if only briefly. First is the frequency with which Rigsbee honors other artists and thinkers. In addition to all the masters already mentioned above, these poems memorialize or otherwise invoke Richard Rorty, Allen Tate, Gil Scott-Heron, Edmund Wilson, George Orwell, Wolfgang Mozart, Randall Jarrell, and Joseph Brodsky. Second is the inclusion here of several lovely poems restoring us to a relationship with nonhuman nature, poems such as “The Mountaintop,” “Crickets,” “Heat,” “Wild Strawberries,” and “Vespers.” “Vespers” appears below, so Rigsbee’s gifts can speak for themselves in closing:

Wind carries off the slighter
birds, after which a purling of doves
adjusts the evening. An owl stands
quiet as a pine cone when a blade of light
breaches the hilltop and is gone. Behind me,
a compact car carries compact profiles
to town. Only a cloud, like a lipstick kiss
left on a mirror, offers
its supplemental farewell to the unbroken haze.
This is the final atmosphere
of a work day, not great bindings
but the modest affinities: bread
crossing the table,
as the jet engine overcomes the dove.

Review of Caitlin Horrocks’ This Is Not Your City

Caitlin Horrocks. This is Not Your City. Sarabande Books. July, 1 2011. Paperback, 168 pp., $15.95

Make the familiar strange, the strange familiar. One of the primary struggles the fiction writer undertakes is to bring “true surprise” to the page – an element of plot or character or a particular voice that on the one hand is unexpected, and on the other hand is completely honest to the world the author has created. Caitlin Horrocks is clearly a writer who takes this struggle seriously. Every story in her debut collection This Is Not Your City aims to startle. From the bizarre premise of a reincarnated bank worker in Des Moines encountering characters that she remembers from her one hundred twenty-six past lives to the subverted expectations in the story of a young teacher punishing her students in creative and perverse ways, Horrocks throws her readers off balance from story to story, page to page.

Overall, this endeavor pays out with dividends. “This Is Not Your City,” the eponymous tale in the collection, stakes out dramatic ground in what is to the majority of readers––and, one might assume, to Horrocks as well––unfamiliar territory: a Russian mail-order bride living in Finland discovers that her fifteen-year old daughter has gone missing after a camping trip with her boyfriend. The first two-thirds of the story offers very little in the way of dramatic action; the main character, Daria, occupies herself with desultory cooking and cleaning while we learn through exposition the events that have led up to the present. And yet the slow pacing does no harm here. On the contrary, it allows us to plumb the depths of Daria’s loneliness in a “marriage [that] is a gaping hush, an unraveling hole that cannot be darned” (139) and to stare mutely at the walls separating her from her daughter, her husband, and the society outside the home in which she lives as a stranger. Having clearly outlined the contours of her character’s world, Horrocks delivers a plot twist in the last third of the story that is deeply satisfying for feeling both unexpected and inevitable.

Three other stories take place outside the United States, and indeed, these are among the strongest in the collection. Horrocks seems to strike the perfect balance between the outwardly unfamiliar and the emotionally honest when she takes her characters abroad. Daria’s isolation as a Russian bride in Finland harkens back to the book’s third story, “Going to Estonia.” In that tale, a young woman moves from the backcountry of northern Finland to the bright lights of Helsinki where, displaced and lonely, she succumbs to the charms of her rakish downstairs neighbor. Horrocks’ talent for combining simple, direct statements with fresh, evocative description is apparent on the very first page, depicting Ursula’s interaction with her seatmate on the bus ride down to the city:

“…At a highway rest stop outside Kemi, the boy stood outside the men’s
toilets puffing out great gouts of air, trying to step forward into the clouds before they disappeared. He had a strange, flat face, and as Ursula watched him choke with laughter at his own breath she thought there was something wrong with him…Back on the bus, the boy introduced himself.

She told him her name and he wrote it unevenly in the moisture on the window, with the R pointed backward. ‘You’re pretty, Ursula,’ he said.

She looked away; it wasn’t true” (33).

As the title suggests, the story features a trip to Estonia, but it is Ursula’s discomfort in her own skin––as reflected in her estrangement from her new home in the capital––that is at its heart.

The two other stories in the book that take place overseas, “The Lion Gate” and “In the Gulf of Aden, Past the Cape of Guardafui,” feature Americans trying to escape troubles back home. The main character in “The Lion Gate” is burdened by a deep, long-growing desperation that has rendered her numb long before we encounter her; taken out of her normal environment, this numbness ebbs and the pain becomes suddenly focused. The emotional territory explored here may be familiar to many readers––Renee, a single woman approaching middle age, struggles with the fact that her chance to have children is rapidly slipping away––and yet the story is in no way a cliché. Rather, the strength of Horrocks’ prose and the depth of her vision ensures that Renee’s tale affects us as if we have never heard anything like it.

The final tale in the book portrays the deep-seeded desperation of its characters to very different effect. When Somali pirates take the cruise ship on which Wil and Lucy Voorhuis are taking a vacation from caring for their severely disabled son, the event is drained of its terror for Lucy:

“If there was to be at some point a separation of sheep and lambs, wheat and chaff, the passengers who would be spared and those who would be executed, she thought she and Wil should volunteer themselves. They were qualified hostages, years of experience. They wouldn’t protest. They could be shuttled and shuffled and they would do it with, if not love, a numb contentment” (161).

Such a direct statement of metaphor is potentially risky, but Horrocks very wisely places it late in the text, at which point we’ve spent enough time with the characters to believe not only the feeling, but their awareness of the feeling. In this way, the moment in which Horrocks shows her hand becomes an organic epiphany for her main character. The story as a whole, meanwhile, reflects the intention behind every tale in This Is Not Your City: to reach beyond the mundane, to cast the line into those deeper waters of the imagination far out from the shore, and to find there the true thing that makes this strange place so familiar.

Review of The Great Night by Chris Adrian

It is a necessity of Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream that the human characters stumbling through the play’s ethereal events be interchangeable. Their compatibility serves the comedic as well as thematic aims of the drama, calling attention to the flippancy of attraction while also challenging the very notion of true love. Chris Adrian’s newest novel, The Great Night, begins on a comparable note of character similitude, his three human protagonists all heading toward the same party “at nearly the same time” via the same San Francisco park, each of them severely “brokenhearted.” Subsequently, the three mortals find themselves entangled in the same supernatural catastrophe, a calamity rooted in the grief of Queen Titania, a fairy goddess suffering the recent loss of both a mortal boy she’d come to love and her husband Oberon. The immediate consequence of her grief is the freeing of Puck, who in Adrian’s telling is a mischievous spirit ravenous for mayhem.

So begins Chris Adrian’s impressively re-imagined version of Shakespeare’s original comedy, and so begin his attempts to bring these two worlds together, to twist the storylines into a tightly-woven, evocative braid. Yet, as Adrian’s novel is no drama, it does something Shakespeare’s play does not, which is to quickly move toward the particular and specific. Adrian devotes the majority of his three-hundred-plus pages to demonstrating exactly how the human protagonists (Molly, Will, and Henry) are distinct people suffering distinct pains. That character development takes the form of lengthy sections of flashback, all intended to lead the reader up to the current moment of crisis while subtly revealing the ways in which Molly, Will, and Henry are tangentially connected. The individual histories move forward beautifully and effortlessly, coloring characters in a way that drama can’t and only novels can, and at the same time providing a welcomed, weighty counterbalance to the novel’s sometimes comic nature. These characters suffer not only in the fairy world, but in the human world as well, and so the stakes are as emotionally tangible as they are poignant.

If there is a downside to Adrian’s approach it is felt in the dramatic present of the story, the actual Great Night, where those significant pasts remain submerged beneath the drunken stupor of fairy liquor and magic. Molly comes closest in allowing her anguish to influence or affect the events of that strange evening, but on the whole she, Will, and Henry bump into one another without understanding or revelation. They are the pawns of the fairy world and despite the lengths Adrian goes to in depicting their troublesome back stories, their pains prove trivial in the face of the supernatural crisis at hand. Like Shakespeare’s transposable depictions, Adrian’s structure comes at the cost of character authenticity. The playwright’s comedy depends on the exploitation of Lysander and Demetrius, caricatures of human desire, and so they are doomed to blank distinction as Athenian men. Similarly, the present-tense sections of The Great Night, in order to strike a humorous tone, belie and debase the complexity of its human protagonists. Adrian seems to undo his own gorgeous work, the drama-in-progress diminishing the characters he spent so much time giving full form to.

What The Great Night truly seems to be, rather than a re-envisioned Shakespearean play, is a beautiful, ghostly meditation on grief and loss. And this is why Adrian’s finest work is found with Titania, the goddess whose pain is the most gripping amongst the players. What Adrian accomplishes with this demanding, majestic fairy queen is to reaffirm a bit of pride in the power and force of human love. Titania’s own flashbacks (to the hospital when her child was sick, to the moments when she and Oberon fought over the boy, to the boy’s tragic, mortal end) first appeared as a masterfully crafted, stand-alone story, called “A Tiny Feast,” in The New Yorker and highlighted the best of this novel. The scenes in and of themselves are intentionally familiar in their sentimental circumstance, which affords Adrian the opportunity for character nuance and allows him to make a complex, intimate woman out of a distant, removed mythical figure. Titania is, of course, humbled by her loss, but Adrian’s careful attention to the flavor of Titania’s naïve agony renders this recognizable situation new and fascinating. An audience can disregard the fall of the mighty and instead empathize and commune with a bereaved deity.

And that is conceivably Adrian’s ultimate aim: to explore the liminal space between grief and salvation, the shadows between loss and redemption. The world of Buena Vista Park on this night is a mixture of the tangible and the airy. It is a passing landscape that will go with the moon and fade with the hours. It is a place both humans and fairies must venture into and out of, and Adrian is in full control of that reality. Perhaps it is his background as a fellow in pediatric hematology-oncology or perhaps it is his previous experience in writing about hospitals and doomed youth (A Better Angel, The Children’s Hospital), but regardless of how, Chris Adrian understands better than most the notion that all love is precious, and mortal or immortal, one always suffers the cost.

Chris Adrian. The Great Night. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Hardcover, 309 pp., $26.00.

Review of Erika Meitner’s Makeshift Instructions for Vigilant Girls

Makeshift Instructions for Vigilant Girls. Erika Meitner. Anhinga Press, 2011, 83 pp. $17.00.

Meitner’s third book provides us with an extraordinary number of encounters – from the creepy school photographer to aliens to high school boys to bride and groom. Although this is her third volume, this manuscript was completed before the manuscript of her second published collection, and there are distinct resonances between this collection and both of her previous ones. The voices of this volume speak more like those of her first collection, Inventory at the All-Night Drugstore, in their sassiness and in the wide variety of the poem settings. But her reflections on place and relationship bear a striking resemblance to top- ics that Meitner came to more fully recognize in her second published collection, Ideal Cities.

This volume is a very chatty book; the voices of this collection are those of girls and women learning to navigate their worlds. To supple- ment their voices, Meitner also borrows from the language of a variety of sources which populate their worlds, such as the language of a US Customs Declaration Form in ‘Quisiera Declarar,’ or the language of prayers in ‘Blow’ and the language of news broadcasts in ‘Electric Girls’ and ‘Instructions for Vigilant Girls’.

The book’s three parts provide an arc of instructions that trace the time from the uncomfortable early edge of puberty to adulthood to an adult period that looks back on the journey. The first part of this book is perhaps the most tentative and halting, echoing the youth of its speakers. With each of the two subsequent sections, the reflections grow deeper, and the wisdom increases alongside the self-assurance of the speakers. In the first section, ‘makeshift instructions for vigilant girls,’ these speakers attempt to navigate puberty, high school, first crushes and sex, and relationships with one another. Meitner manages to capture the sense of uncertainty of her teenage speakers, caught in the sex-ex classroom through language pinpointing the anxiety, woes and hopes of these young speakers. But the voice that tells this also is sometimes a voice looking back on those days. Ruefully, the poet comments,

‘Someone needs to remind them, in the silence
of the beep – the longest hanging moment ever –
that we don’t need to ask forgiveness for exploring fingers,
roving lips and tangled limbs…
… The force that drives all flesh
exhausts, exalts, raises us up, ecstatic.’
––‘Sex Ed’

And with this, we see Meitner’s primary exploration, which is not merely a set of instructions but the makeshift nature of both what would suffice or what is needed. In short, the speakers themselves, in their par- ticular situations, are of importance, because of the way the reader can relate to each. She further creates community through the trope of the speaker speaking across the years to a former self, and among the voices that speak in the poems, creating a virtual community of women. In the second section, ‘the contact notes,’ we see the first fruits of earned wis- doms. The third part, ‘domestic spasm,’ arguably the most formally and thematically daring, in which the speakers see themselves close to or in the present, and reflect upon what the self needs now. In many ways, this collection is a collection of stories; yet the poems of this collection rely on a variety of narratives. Many root themselves in the little vignettes that have made up a life – or lives – that a girl or woman has gone through: the discomfort of the sex-ex classroom. First sex. Crushes. Booty calls. And some more fantastical, such as alien abduction.

This third collection of Meitner’s continues to offer reflections on a number of topics that she has begun elsewhere to discuss, while providing new voices and new reflections into her poetry. It is a wonderful addition to the two volumes she has already brought forth.

Review of Jake Adam York’s Persons Unknown

Jake Adam York. Persons Unknown. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 2010. Paper, 100 pp., $14.95.

 

Jake Adam York’s third collection of poems, Persons Unknown, is in many ways a continuation of the project he began in Murder Ballads (Elixir Press, 2005) and brought into focus with A Murmuration of Starlings (SIU Press, 2008)—a project that, as Major Jackson puts it, “consecrates and memorializes the souls, blood, and bones of those black men and women slaughtered on the altar of hate and violence during the Civil Rights era.” In fact, in his notes at the end of Persons Unknown, York invites us to insert these newest elegies for the Civil Rights martyrs directly into the body of A Murmuration of Starlings’ narrative. It’s true that poems such as “And Ever” and “The Hands of Persons Unknown” might well be continuations of the previous collection’s “Substantiation” and “The Crowd He Becomes.” However, new to Persons Unknown is York’s unique take on self-portraiture. In the book’s second half we find poems entitled “Self-Portrait as a Moment in 1963,” “Self-Portrait in a Plate-Glass Window,” “Self-Portrait at a Bend in the Road,” and “Self-Portrait in the Town Where I Was Born.” In the third of these, York writes:

 

 […] I catch myself

on the car’s hot windows,
  distorted just enough
to be someone else—a cousin

or a local on the edge of the frame
  ready to disappear
into the smoke or the heat or the trees.

The mountain’s dark behind me.
  My hand’s on the latch,
the last warmth still there.

One of us is leaving.

One of us is already gone.

 

Where we readers might expect to find pure autobiography, we find portraits of a place with the poet somewhere in the background, like Icarus in Bruegel’s famously ekphrasized painting. For York, a self-portrait is a portrait of the South, and not only the people—never merely “a cousin // or a local”—but the very landscape itself. These people, be they martyrs or murderers, nameless townsfolk or the poet himself, are all “distorted just enough / to be someone else,” even each other; and the landscape of York’s South, from the “low storm of pine” where the “hickory tang snares us” to the “inscription of moonlight and clouds” reflecting in a plate-glass window, so fully permeates these people that they are “ready to disappear / into the smoke or the heat or the trees.”

In Persons Unknown’s final poem, “Elegy,” York tells the story of two racial murders in his hometown of Gadsden, Alabama. In telling this story, the poem describes a Gadsden landmark—a statue of the little girl who pointed Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, who would later found the Ku Klux Klan, toward safety as he and his troops retreated from Union forces. The statue’s finger, once pointing across the river, has now been broken off. York writes:

 

We come over the bridge.
  We do not look back.
We think of the girl as we pass,
  and the finger we imagine still pointing the way.

 

Here, York’s “we” speaks (as it often does) for himself, for his readers, and for the South—the places and people whose troubled histories have been much written by what the statue represents. Never forget, he seems to tell us. Don’t look back, but don’t ever forget. After reading poems as muscular, insistently lyric, and devastating in their honesty as Jake Adam York’s latest, his readers will surely heed this call to memory.